Contract Migration and Rebranding Updates for Crypto Projects

What does a contract migration and rebrand update cover?

This service coordinates the public-profile changes needed when a project moves to a new token contract or changes its identity. The goal is to make the relationship between the old and new token clear, and to submit consistent information to the relevant platforms.

Depending on your project, the scope can include:

• Recording old and new contract addresses, chain, ticker, token name and official logo files.
• Preparing update requests for CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko profiles.
• Coordinating profile changes on DEXTools and DEXScreener where the token is indexed.
• Checking project-controlled pages and supplied references for consistency.
• Tracking submissions and noting any platform response or additional evidence request.

A migration is not simply a logo replacement. The old contract may remain visible in historical data, while the new contract becomes the current reference for trading and project communications. We establish which asset is current, what should remain in historical context, and how the project describes the transition. If you also need an initial tracker profile rather than an existing profile update, review our CoinMarketCap listing and CoinGecko listing services.

How are CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko and DEX screener updates handled?

Each platform update is prepared against the project’s existing profile and the evidence available for the change. We match the submitted details to the correct asset and explain the link between the previous and current contract, rather than treating the new address as an unrelated token.

For market data trackers, the request should identify the existing listing, the change being requested and the project’s official references. For DEX screeners, we first check whether the relevant pair or token profile is already indexed, then prepare the profile details that the platform makes available for updating. A profile change and a new token or pair appearing in search are separate matters, so they are scoped separately when needed.

A useful submission pack usually includes:

• The chain and exact old and new contract addresses.
• The approved ticker, name, description and logo asset.
• Official website and social links that support the project’s identity.
• A concise explanation of the migration, including the effective transition details supplied by your team.
• Supporting announcements or explorer references, where available.

If supply data also needs review, treat that as a distinct workstream and prepare evidence specifically for it. See circulating supply verification for that process. For profile changes on DEXTools and DEXScreener, see DEX profile updates.

What should your team prepare before submitting a migration?

A migration request is easier to review when the project can show a consistent, verifiable connection between its old and new token details. Before work begins, appoint one decision-maker to confirm the canonical information and approve every public-facing asset.

Use this preparation checklist:

• Confirm the exact chain and contract address for both the previous and current token.
• Decide whether the ticker, project name, logo, or more than one identity element is changing.
• Provide the official migration announcement and the channels where holders can find it.
• Share the project website, social profiles and explorer pages that should be referenced.
• Identify existing tracker and screener profiles, including direct profile links where possible.
• Flag any profile that is inaccurate, inaccessible or displaying a notice that requires separate remediation.

Keep spelling, capitalization and logo versions consistent across the pack. If the team has not finalised the new ticker or identity assets, pause submissions until those choices are approved; conflicting versions can create avoidable clarification rounds. For explorer metadata that needs a separate update, the explorer token information service can be considered alongside this work. Our listings and verification overview helps teams identify other related profile tasks.

What do you receive, and how does the project progress?

You receive a documented scope, organised update materials and a clear record of submission status. The work begins with a review of the project’s current profiles and approved migration details, then moves into preparation, submission and follow-up.

The project typically follows these stages:

• Intake: We collect the token details, profile links, official references and approved identity assets.
• Profile review: We map which profiles exist and which changes belong to each platform.
• Preparation: We align the wording and evidence, then identify missing items before submission.
• Submission and follow-up: Requests are sent through the applicable platform process, and responses are tracked for action.
• Closeout: You receive a summary of completed work, outstanding platform decisions and any next steps for your team.

Timing is shaped by how complete the evidence is, how many profiles are in scope and whether platforms request clarification. Your team can help keep work moving by returning one consolidated set of approvals and answering evidence questions promptly. The deliverable is coordinated preparation and follow-through—not a claim that every profile will change on the same day. If the migration also requires a new tracker profile, we can clarify that scope before work starts rather than silently combining it with profile edits.

Which migration decisions remain with the platforms?

CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, DEXTools and DEXScreener control their own review, indexing and profile presentation. We can deliver the agreed preparation, submit requests through the applicable process and respond to review questions, but we cannot promise that a platform will approve a change, display it by a particular time, merge historical records or rank the new token in a specific way. A platform may ask for more evidence or retain historical information about the former contract.

This matters most when a project expects a ticker or logo change to make the old token disappear, or assumes a new contract will inherit every element of the previous profile. State the migration clearly in your own official channels and ensure the requested change does not imply that past trading or supply data belongs to a different asset unless the evidence supports that interpretation.

Keep adjacent tasks separate in your plan. Supply review has its own evidence requirements; a listing profile update is not a substitute for supply verification. If a profile has an existing data issue or warning that needs investigation, scope listing profile remediation rather than treating it as a routine rebrand edit. We report platform responses accurately and distinguish submitted requests from confirmed changes.

Prices

Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.

How it works

1. Share token and profile detailsSend the old and new contract addresses, chain, current profile links and approved identity assets. Identify one person who can confirm project facts.
2. Confirm the change scopeWe map the requested ticker, name, logo and contract changes to the relevant profiles, separating profile edits from new listings or supply review.
3. Prepare the evidence packWe organise official references and consistent project details, then flag missing information for your team to resolve before submission.
4. Submit and follow upWe coordinate requests through applicable platform processes, track replies and help prepare clarifications based on the project evidence.
5. Report the statusYou receive a closeout summary that distinguishes completed profile changes from pending platform decisions and any recommended next work.